A major difference between Southern States and Alaska is the
Southern States did not pretend then or now that Jim Crow laws
discriminating on the basis of race never happened. The history
of segregation and the fight to end it is a part of Southern history.
In Alaska most citizens who were not here at the time are surprised
with disbelief to find the circumstances also happened here.
...Paul Ongtooguk
|
Desegregation In Alaskas Schools:
Alaska Yesterday
By Stephen Haycox
Anchorage Times, Anchorage, Alaska
January 26, 1986
Used with permission of the author
School desegregation, which has played such a significant role in American
social policy, has also had a long and difficult history in Alaskas
development, stretching back to the beginning of the century.
By the time mission patriarch Sheldon Jackson left the territory in
1907, separate schools for white and native children were a recognized
and accepted fact of Alaskan existence. But the implications of such
an arrangement took some time to discover.
At that time in American history it was still widely thought that the
only future for Indians was complete assimilation into white society.
The idea of permanent, self-determining Indian communities with legitimate,
independent existence was not yet accepted. Indians were not yet considered
citizens; they were viewed as wards under the protection of federal
government.
As was the case in other parts of the country, some natives in Alaska
voluntarily became well assimilated. They adopted western dress, lived
in separate houses in small, nuclear families, were economically self-sufficient,
and paid taxes.
Not surprisingly, some assimilated natives sought to have their children
admitted to the white schools. Because of problems with attendance and
wide varieties of literacy, mastery of subjects in the Indian schools
often progressed more slowly than in the white schools.
Initially, however, the courts prohibited native children from attending
the white schools. In 1908 a federal district judge ruled that even
though Indians might be well assimilated, continued association with
other Indians, assimilated or not, meant they were still Indian, and
therefore not entitled to attend white schools, which were for whites!
Indians began to wonder if there was anything they might do to qualify
for full acceptance into white society, or whether just the fact of
being Indian would always keep them subordinate.
Probably most responsible for confronting the implications of school
attendance policy was the early Tlingit leader William Paul. He would
be eclipsed by other native leaders in later years as the chief spokesman
for Indian rights in Alaska, but in the 1920s he had no peer in
that role.
Following a resolution on school desegregation adopted at the annual
Alaska Native Brotherhood convention in Wrangell in 1920, Paul met with
the head of Alaska Indian schools, Charles Hawkesworth. Shortly after
the meeting Hawkesworth, who was sympathetic to the cause of equal rights
for Indians, announced that the Wrangell Indian school would close for
the next school session. As a result, Indian children in Wrangell would
have to attend the white school.
Territorial and federal officials protested vigorously, and within
a few weeks the U.S. Commission of Education in Washington countermanded
Hawkesworths order.
There the situation likely would have remained except for the U.S.
Indian Citizenship Act of 1924, granting full citizenship to natives.
Now Indians could hope for equal opportunity with white citizens.
But still territorial schools in many places did not accept Indian
children, and in 1929 Paul brought suit against the Ketchikan school
board for refusing to admit Indian students.
This time the court found for the Indian children. As citizens they
were entitled to attend schools established for citizen children. It
was a major victory that opened white schools to those native children
who sought entrance to them.
Stephen Haycox is a professor of history at the University of Alaska
Anchorage.
Back to Jim Crow Index
|