By Georgianna Lincoln, Athabascan, Rampart
When I was a little girl, my mother taught me that our Athabascan tribe contains many subtribes, dialects, and customs, each having its own chief and set of Elders.
Imagine my surprise to read the following words in a history textbook called America, America and written for tenth graders in American schools: "A tribe is a group that is united by a common history, follows the same customs, and is ruled by the same chief or group of Elders. The people of each tribe speak the same language, and have the same religion."
Unfortunately, this inaccuracy is mild compared to some of the other things I discovered while reviewing how Native Americans are portrayed in the history textbooks used in our schools, and how they have been regarded by society. Its no wonder that some of the general public, and to some extent, even a former president of the United States, continue to think of Native Americans as "savages."
One textbook, for example, a lower elementary social studies text called Family and Friends, depicts a Native family of four dressed in Western clothing and lighting their daughters birthday cake amid modern napkins, china dishes, silverware, and ornate furniture.
This is not to say some Indians are not Westernized, but I don't believe this would be the image that most Native Americans would want to give American children who are just learning about American Indians. Instead of middle America, why not show an Indian family in a natural setting, surrounded by extended family members in a village or on a reservation?
When American children reach the seventh grade, they may read the history text, People, Places and Change, which devotes but one page to American Indians, of which an illustration of a Pueblo takes up half the page.
Considering that Native Americans were the first people on this continent, it should stand to reason that American Indian history, art, folk tales, literature, religion, and language would be accorded the proper coverage, respect, and accuracy in textbooks. No such luck.
On the college level, a freshman history class uses a textbook called The American Nation. Just four of 972 pages are dedicated to the history of Indians during the late 1800s. Students learn only that Indians went to war over losing their land. I do not believe this goes far enough. For example, this history text does not tell who American Indians are. How did they live? What was an Indian community like? What was it like to be born into an Indian family? What was their relationship to other tribes? How did they determine boundaries? What was their means of transportation before the influx of white settlers? How was the chief selected? What were the various roles of family members?
Interestingly, a timeline in The American Nation depicts historical events for this period, but not one single Indian name or event is recognized.
Unfortunately, few history texts being published even today reflect any meaningful change. For example, the text From Columbus to Aquarius was termed "controversial" by an instructor because it revealed "too much" of the Indians history, dilemma, and treatment. The first chapter of this text, for example, gives the history of Indian culture, not wars. Also, a listing of chronological dates and events of Indian cultural cycles is, indeed, refreshing, if "controversial."
Next, the author of this text writes a mock story headed, "The Only Good Indian Is a Dead Indian!" The story depicts a cowboy-and-Indian covered wagon scene, with Indians scalping the white man and the white man shooting the Indians, and with the cavalry (of course) driving the Indians back to their little piece of the earth. This satire, I believe, points out the unfair treatment of Native Americans in American history textbooks.
Moreover, the author states: "Unknown or forgotten are the many accomplishments and contributions of the Indian before, during and after the arrival of the white man. . . . The American Indian was really the first explorer, colonist, and conqueror of the North American continentthe first American." I believe that this is really the crux of the matter. If all history books were to give credit to American Indians for all their accomplishments, American society would not be so ignorant on the subject. But we are. Consequently, the negative stereotyping of Indians, which we are taught and which we teach our children, perpetuates itself from one generation to the next.
Indeed, many people continue to think of Indians as "savages" with no feelings. National Geographic highlighted the problem in its March 1989 issue. The magazine reported on a historical Indian burial ground desecrated by grave robbers searching for Indian artifacts that had been buried with the dead. In fact, National Geographic reported that even whole skulls still are sold at non-Indian swap meets. Incredibly, some sources quoted in this article see grave diggers as collectors of history, not destroyers of it. Where might this mentality come from? I suggest, to a large extent, from school textbooks.
National Geographic did not let archaeologists off the hook, either. With bones scattered over a wide burial area that had been disturbed, archaeologists collected them for study, the magazine reported, then returned them to the Indians for reburial.
"What if this were a white cemetery that had been desecrated? Would the archaeologists be bagging the disturbed bones and grave goods to take them for study at museums and universities?" asked an American Indian interviewed for the National Geographic story.
Is this a result of an ignorance of or insensitivity to Indian history by those who may have read the school history texts previously mentioned?
Ronald Reagan, in response to a question from Moscow State University students late in his presidency, said that it might have been better to have forced Native Americans to enter Western culture instead of living in a "primitive life-style" on reservations.
Again, Mr. Reagan was perpetuating the cowboy and Indian image: the cowboy to the rescue and the Indian doing the scalping. If Americas former highest government official does not know the difference, what more can we expect from the students in classrooms? What textbooks did Ronald Reagan read in school?
American history textbooks must give a fair, historical perspective of American Indians, not a vision of half-naked savages scalping people and burning wagons. They must portray the Indian as the first explorer, the first colonist, the first conqueror of the North American continentTHE FIRST AMERICAN!
Henry S. Commager, the famous historian, once wrote: "A people without a history is like a man without memory; each generation would have to learn everything anewmake the same discoveries, invent the same tools and techniques, wrestle with the same problems, commit the same errors."
American Indians ask for no less. American Indians do not want their children growing up with an image of the first Americans as brutal savages.
Cost and Availability of Authentic Alaska: Voices of Its Native Writers by Susan B. Andrew and John Creed: $35 cloth; $15 paper. Available from the University of Nebraska Press, P.O. Box 880484, Lincoln, NE 68588-0484 U.S.A. Individuals are urged to order through their local bookseller. Direct orders must be prepaid. Please add shipping charge of $4. Canadian Residents please add 7% GST. Credit card orders may be placed by calling 800-755-1105. On-line catalog nebraskapress.unl.edu.